Alcoholism Isnt A Disease 1
Anonymous
Article
Alcoholism is not a disease. It
could cause a
disease, something
malfunctioning within the
body;
but even at its most
destructive,
the drive to drink excessively is
more a symptom of other
conditions than a disease
in and of itself.
Although so-called alcoholics may experience
physical manifestations of being poisoned, chief among
them the physical need for alcohol to rid the body of
withdrawal symptoms, this is not a disease but a vicious
cycle. When the medical community "cures" alcoholics, it
does so by trying to introduce enough emotional strength
in the alcoholics so that they don't need alcohol. The
treatment is not about alcohol. Alcohol may be damaging
to one's body but requires no medication to fix (with the
exception, perhaps, of Alabuse, which makes any alcohol
consumption immediately painful and uncomfortable for
the alcoholic). Sure, people who drink alcohol need
alcohol -- but they also need air, and water and food.
Just because alcohol is not necessary for existence, why
should reliance on its effects be called a disease when
reliance on oxygen isn't seen as such?
The body is not meant to live forever; but we should
be
able to enjoy life. Sometimes compulsiveness makes us
go
too far, but this can happen with almost any substance
-
- water, soda, candy, movies, porn, shoplifting,
religion.
While many see the effects of alcoholism as a social
"disease", this is metaphorical. Without alcohol,
where
would we be? Only using other crutches, trying to
deal
with an existence whose meaning we are not privy to.
Introducing a substance into one's body is not a
disease.
It could be a disorder, but alcoholism is not what needs
to
be cured, it's what brought the alcoholic to overly rely
on
the spirits in the first place. Therefore the "disease"
needs
to be redefined. If someone has a chronic illness in
which
certain symptoms are manifested, the medical
community
should search for ways to treat the illness at its
root
rather than mask the symptoms.
Raging Alcoholic
|